quote:

Originally posted by hi:
......actually.. i'm the shortest in my family.. and all the men are 6 feet or higher

that's just "great".

quote:

Originally posted by hi:
height isn't a major thing for me... but i don't like breaking my neck in order to get a kiss... i'm 5'5"

Hey! But paul.. i said this before talking 'bout my family

i've got love for the shorter men just not the giants

Okay, I somehow missed this thread, but here comes my input.

Every girl I have ever dated has been between 5'2" and 5'4" and I am 6'0" so apparently I like them short....WITH LITTLE FEET....that is a must, and they ALL had shapely butts. I don't mean big, I don't mean flat, I mean nice, perky, and noticeable. The woman that I have been talking to for the past month is gorgeous, 5'7" and has a ghetto booty that is just......WOW.....I have always been a butt man, so this post hits home. I do agree with Bobby though, boobs are not a biggie as long as the boobs they do have are normal and not all disfigured or different sizes etc etc....Does that make me shallow??

quote:

Originally posted by Trey's Daddy:
I do agree with Bobby though, boobs are not a biggie as long as the boobs they do have are normal and not all disfigured or different sizes etc etc....Does that make me shallow??

i don't think anyone could be considered shallow for not wanting a disfigured companion...

it would make you shallow if you fell in love with one and couldn't be with her still b/c of it

quote:

Originally posted by Trey's Daddy:
I do agree with Bobby though, boobs are not a biggie as long as the boobs they do have are normal and not all disfigured or different sizes

Well, T's Daddy, you'll need to cross my name off your list of applicants.

Yes, mine are 2 different sizes. Not drastically, or anything! I mean I can't tell unless I'm actually looking at them in the mirror, naked. Unfortunately, after 10 months of nursing, my boobs were unable to recover.

*hangs head; sighs*
Tiffany

Thats no biggy, Tiffy.

Havent met a woman yet that wasnt slight...uh...lopsided.

I'm sure as smart as TD, is...he wouldnt mind.

I heard somewhere that brests are always different sizes, even though slightly unless they are "manufactured"

Yep...just like the majority of men ...are uhm....how do I put this gently...LOL.."oh so slightly crooked"? ..No...that's not it...Bent? No...not that. Not straight as a arrow? Scratch that one!

Oh well..you get the picture. LOL

[/QUOTE]
Yes, mine are 2 different sizes. Not drastically, or anything! I mean I can't tell unless I'm actually looking at them in the mirror, naked. Unfortunately, after 10 months of nursing, my boobs were unable to recover.

*hangs head; sighs*
Tiffany[/QUOTE]

I am with you here Tiffany. I think that we are the only ones who notice it though. Every time I point it out to someone they tell me I am crazy. But they aren't stuffing them into a bra everyday!

And thanks Paul and smshy...there is hope yet that I am normal.
Well...ok...just thanks.

i think those "slight" differences don't count in what TD was saying.... no one is symmetrical. Eyes are off a bit, one foot slightly different, legs not equal lengths. They are mostly unnoticeable... except by the person looking into the mirror

During my art class we did a study we created 2 forms

one perfect in every way..We took all the features and shapes of what people find beautiful and added them everything as symmetrical as possible from a pc application..For lack of others words each part was perfect flawless but when added together the form looked plan and fake almost homely

the second form had the same features but we turned and twisted and reshaped different aspect and tweaked each part as a separate and then readded to the form (nothing to extreme by tweak)

it was beautiful

its not our perfections that make us unique and beautiful its our subtle imperfection that set us apart.

oooooooo i like that bishop!

Its true heidi the prettiest girl i was with had a slight under bite

I remember watching a documentary once of what defines 'beauty'. They had babies view two sets of photos. One 'beautiful' and one 'not beautiful'. They said babies tend to look at the 'beautiful' photo a lot longer than the 'not'. After researching the photos, it turned out that the 'beautiful' photo was more symmetrical than the 'not' and the more symmetrical it was, the more beautiful. They even gave a specific model/actress who's considered to have one of the most symmetrical faces they've tested - and she was what many would consider beautiful!

I guess it kind of contradicts to what Bishop just said (sorry) however .. I agree with him. It's the very imperfections that allows us to stand out in an attractive way. Take the singer Jewel for example. I think she's hot! But when you look at her teeth, they aren't very nice at all. If she were ever to have dental surgery, it would take away her 'look' and IMO it would also take away from her own natural beauty.

As for men, I like them little. I'm only 5'4 and like them to be 5'5-5'9 (give and take). As long as they're taller than me - even if just a slight.

quote:

Originally posted by miss jes:
...As for men, I like them little. I'm only 5'4 and like them to be 5'5-5'9 (give and take). As long as they're taller than me - even if just a slight.

Geeez....once again....I come in under the "minimum" mark.