Although my ex-husband is not biologically my daughters father, we were married when she was born. He knew he wasn't her father, it wasn't deceptive or anything like that, the pregnancy is actually what brought us back together! Anyway, When we divorced our older son went with him and our daughter went with me..was supposed to be until we all got settled, but didn't work out that way...if I filed for support for her, would I get any considering we both have a child living with us? He makes way more money than I do, I don't know if that would matter. Could he file for support from me too then?? I don't want to bother with it if its just going to cause more trouble. I was told that I had to file against him, not her biological father, since we were married when she was born.

I would certain try the worst you will be told is no .No farther ahead no father behind.Take care of yourself .

there is a presumption that if you were living together and married when the child was born, he is the father. He can rebut that presumption if he ever had to in court with a DNA test.

However, if a man holds himself out to be the bio dad, tells the child he is the bio dad and the child relies on that and believes it, he is the father as a matter of law and nothing can change that. (California law).

You are entitled to support for the girl, and he is entitled to support for the boy. If his earnings are much higher, he will likely be the one paying. The amount of visitation each one of you has with the other child will greatly impact the order.

Good luck!

Ronn (ChildSupportEnforcers.com)